<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wei Wu Wei and Cognitive Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei</link>
	<description>Conversation across several divides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 14:42:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Caution required</title>
		<link>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2011/09/caution-required/</link>
		<comments>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2011/09/caution-required/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 14:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fcummins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In considering parallels and resonances between latter day cognitive science and Eastern Philosophy, it is important to bear in mind that within the latter traditions, there is very often no distinction made between &#8216;is&#8217; and &#8216;ought&#8217;.  The use of language is often simply assumed to be to guide behavior, while it simultaneously illuminates and reveals [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2011/09/caution-required/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Embodied thought</title>
		<link>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2011/09/embodied-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2011/09/embodied-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 14:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fcummins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[§41. Thought as Action Action is a demonstration of thought. Action, being the exterioration of thought, Dualistic thought demonstrates as volitional action This quote could almost be taken from recent work in cognitive science.  More and more, it has become clear that observing neural and muscular activity is to observe thought.  A clear example, is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2011/09/embodied-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perception and Perceiving</title>
		<link>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2011/01/perception-and-perceiving/</link>
		<comments>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2011/01/perception-and-perceiving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 23:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fcummins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subject and object]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not the eye that sees, it is not the ear that hears; There is seeing, there is hearing. Who sees? Who hears? No one. That is the truth. For the seeing and the seen, the hearing and the heard are impersonality, impersonal consciousness.  (Ask the Awakened, p. 30) WWW distinguishes between a process [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2011/01/perception-and-perceiving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minds and Experience</title>
		<link>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2009/12/minds-and-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2009/12/minds-and-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 12:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fcummins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[objectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subject and object]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subjectivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dualist psychology necessarily maintains an uncomfortable position with respect to the centrality of subjective experience in our account of what is.  Where behaviorism categorically outlawed any explanatory recourse to spooky, unverifiable and immeasurable mental states, latter-day cognitive psychology has constructed an elaborate hypothetical system, the Cognitive System, that plays many of the roles of Mind, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2009/12/minds-and-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of sentience</title>
		<link>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2008/12/of-sentience/</link>
		<comments>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2008/12/of-sentience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fcummins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do not possess sentience: What sentience is &#8211; I am. (Posthumous Pieces, §42) This little quip captures nicely just what is missing from the orthodox account of minds and brains provided by cognitive psychology.  Consciousness, Mind and Cognition are all words that have spun a web of confusion around our understanding of our selves.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2008/12/of-sentience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of Duality</title>
		<link>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2008/12/of-duality/</link>
		<comments>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2008/12/of-duality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fcummins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoza]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of us trained in cognitive science, psychology, or Western philosophy of mind are avowed monists.  That seems sensible.  But we do not always agree what that means.  A convenient but short-sighted account is to focus on Rene Descartes and the notion that Mind and Matter are separate realms interacting in some mysterious way (or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pinkmonkeyfarm.com/weiwuwei/2008/12/of-duality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

